SERVICE, RE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
OracleTPS, 9:41 AM
Welcome. This is the Re Implementation Strategy service. We use third party support as the budget bridge to a non Oracle future. A Fixed plus Success engagement that funds and times the move.
TPS today. The exit on your terms.
Engagement modelBoth fees apply
Component 01 Default
Fixed Fee
Flat advisory fee that covers the architecture roadmap, the cost model, and the phased re implementation plan.
Component 02 Default
Success Fee
Percentage of the verified annual savings once you sign with a third party support vendor. Only paid when you save.
You, 9:42 AM
Why is this its own service?
OracleTPS, 9:42 AM
Because the support decision and the modernisation decision are usually run by two different teams that never compare notes. The third party support savings can fund the exit. The exit roadmap can justify the third party support move to the board. We run both threads together.
Scope of work
Inside this engagement you get:
- Current state mapping of the Oracle estate by product, version, business process, and dependency.
- Replacement market scan by Oracle product covering SaaS, best of breed, and open source candidates.
- Total cost of ownership model for the current Oracle estate, the third party bridge, and the replacement target.
- Sequencing plan covering which Oracle modules retire in which year against which replacement.
- Data and integration architecture for the bridge years where both systems are running.
- Change and adoption plan for the affected business teams.
- Board pack with the savings number, the investment number, and the net cash position year by year.
Deliverables you keep
At the end of the engagement you take away:
- Three to five year re implementation roadmap with funded phases.
- TCO model showing third party support as the bridge funding source.
- Replacement shortlist with named software vendors and implementation partners by domain.
- Decision gate framework for each milestone.
- Risk register with the cloud, integration, and people risks scored and owned.
Who this is for
This service is typically engaged by:
- CIOs and Heads of Enterprise Architecture planning a multi year Oracle exit.
- CFOs who want the support cost reduction tied to a credible modernisation programme.
- Private equity portfolio teams looking to release working capital from Oracle support spend.
- Heads of digital transformation reporting to the board on application portfolio strategy.
You, 9:44 AM
What savings can we model?
Across 200 plus engagements2026 YTD
50%
Average savings vs Oracle Premier Support
200+
TPS engagements advised
20+
Years combined Oracle experience
You, 9:45 AM
Send me a quote.
You, 9:47 AM
A few quick questions first.
Why is third party support called a bridge?
Because the savings from moving off Oracle support typically reach fifty percent of annual spend. That released budget funds the modernisation programme that replaces the underlying Oracle product over the next three to five years.
Which Oracle products are easiest to retire?
Oracle E Business Suite, JD Edwards, PeopleSoft, and Siebel are the most common candidates for re implementation. Each has a maturing replacement market in SaaS or open source. The strategy maps your specific modules against the strongest available replacements.
How is the Success Fee calculated?
The Success Fee component is a percentage of verified annual savings versus your Oracle support baseline once you sign with the third party vendor. The Fixed Fee component covers the roadmap and architecture work.
How long is the typical re implementation horizon?
Three to five years from third party support cutover to final Oracle decommission. The roadmap breaks that horizon into funded phases with named owners and explicit decision gates.
Do we have to commit to leaving Oracle?
No. Many buyers run the strategy work and then choose to stay on third party support indefinitely. The roadmap simply makes the exit option real and costed in case the business decides to take it.
You, 9:50 AM
What other services do you offer?